<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drop Print-to-Web and may the best man win</title>
	<link>http://blog.classyfeeds.com/2006/09/12/drop-print-to-web-and-may-the-best-man-win/</link>
	<description>A Matt Terenzio Wordpress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.classyfeeds.com/2006/09/12/drop-print-to-web-and-may-the-best-man-win/#comment-458</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.classyfeeds.com/2006/09/12/drop-print-to-web-and-may-the-best-man-win/#comment-458</guid>
					<description>Thanks for this post, good insight. 

I've included it into one my my own:

http://www.web2.0newspapers.com/?p=45

Check it out. 

- Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post, good insight. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve included it into one my my own:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.web2.0newspapers.com/?p=45' rel='nofollow'>http://www.web2.0newspapers.com/?p=45</a></p>
<p>Check it out. </p>
<p>- Jonathan
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Media, Messages, and Moolah: The Right Content in the Right Form</title>
		<link>http://blog.classyfeeds.com/2006/09/12/drop-print-to-web-and-may-the-best-man-win/#comment-457</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.classyfeeds.com/2006/09/12/drop-print-to-web-and-may-the-best-man-win/#comment-457</guid>
					<description>[...] In part a response to Jeff Jarvis&amp;#39; post that evaluates making paid-for papers free and how revenue from Web site ads works (or could work better), Matt Terenzio at Classyfeeds discusses the role of advertising on newspaper Web sites and fiting content to form (i.e. not just recreating print concepts online). I agree wholesale about the multimedia advertorials, Flash &amp;#34;books&amp;#34; etc. that he scorns as not only near-worthless content but poor uses of the Web medium, and I rather enjoyed Terenzio&amp;#39;s discourse on the idea of mediia-owned distribution channels. He comes down to this: &amp;#34;Newspapers need to free themselves of the baggage that is weighing down their online strategies. Let print be print, and online be online, and don&amp;#8217;t let one hinder the other.&amp;#34;&amp;#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In part a response to Jeff Jarvis&#39; post that evaluates making paid-for papers free and how revenue from Web site ads works (or could work better), Matt Terenzio at Classyfeeds discusses the role of advertising on newspaper Web sites and fiting content to form (i.e. not just recreating print concepts online). I agree wholesale about the multimedia advertorials, Flash &quot;books&quot; etc. that he scorns as not only near-worthless content but poor uses of the Web medium, and I rather enjoyed Terenzio&#39;s discourse on the idea of mediia-owned distribution channels. He comes down to this: &quot;Newspapers need to free themselves of the baggage that is weighing down their online strategies. Let print be print, and online be online, and don&rsquo;t let one hinder the other.&quot;&nbsp; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
